Evolution begins all ideas with the basic assumption that everything in the physical universe--from Big Bang dust particles to spontaneous life from lifeless chemicals--originated via natural random processes with no intelligent involvement. But (as discussed in "100 Year Cover-up Revealed"), since proven laws of nature (Thermodynamics) and proven science (Louis Pasteur et al...) state unequivocally that the physical universe could not have originated in this manner, then, logically, given the very fact that the physical universe exists, it must have originated in another manner, right? That only other manner is by intention. Think about that for a moment. The only two ways the universe could have originated are either accidentally or intentionally, right? And since the accidental way (evolution) has been disproved, that, by definition, means that the universe was created by intention; that is, by purposeful planning. Purpose, planning and intention, of course, are products of intelligence, clearly meaning, logically and scientifically, that our universe was created by an intelligent force that existed prior to our universe.
Evolutionists Unwittingly Witness to the Intelligent Truth
Amazingly, evolutionists unconsciously acknowledge intelligent involvement in the origin, design, and development of our universe. This is seen in some of the concepts and terminology they refer to:
Intelligent Nature
A general tendency among evolutionists is to give nature, by clear implication, intelligent attributes like providence, planning and willful action. First of all, they essentially say that nature uses evolution as a tool to make everything the way it is. With natural selection, for example, Darwin himself (1859) said that “nature acts to preserve and accumulate…advantageous genetic mutations,” which is part and parcel of evolutionary thinking. But doesn’t such a concept clearly connote that ‘nature’ is willfully acting in a manner that brings about a pre-planned result?
If giraffes’ necks really elongated due to the efforts of its ancestors to eat from higher branches—or due to any other natural selection mechanism—doesn’t that mean that nature recognized the giraffes’ need for a longer neck to eat from higher branches, chose to resolve the need, decided on a specific plan to do so, then implemented the plan? All these actions are tacitly attributed to ‘nature,’ yet they are also clear qualities of intelligence.
Intelligent Design
Evolutionists also give credit to nature for the design of everything in the universe. For example, to give credit to nature for the “evolution” of our eyes, is to also imply that nature designed them ahead of time and then worked on that design for millions of years until it materialized. As discussed in "100 Year Cover-up Revealed," for a complex organ like an eye to function, all of its myriad components must be simultaneously present and operational, meaning that all of its components had to “evolve” at the same time from start to finish. That, of course, implies a pre-design and, therefore, intelligent involvement. And, need I reiterate that no partially “evolved” eyes have ever been found to counter this observation?
Intelligent Underlying Laws
What about the ‘laws’ of nature that are universally recognized? Even evolutionists, recognize the tendency of everything in our universe, to adhere to certain rules and laws; that is, to predictable and consistent patterns of order, development, function, behavior, appearance, and other qualities, according to its individual ‘nature.’ If the rules governing such phenomena as electricity, subatomic physics; gravity, light, sound, and color frequencies, to name a few, were random, they would change periodically, making life and everything else in the universe much different than it is today. That is, assuming that life as we know it would be possible at all with random underlying laws.
Thus, it goes without saying that nature’s rules and laws are permanently in place and, therefore, non-random. This is why, for example, a boulder rolling off a cliff will never rise or hover, but will always fall to the ground. In addition, to stress an earlier observation, if these rules and our adherence to them did not originate randomly (accidentally), the only other possible manner would be by intentionally directed processes, meaning intelligent involvement. Their awareness, at some level, of the intelligent nature of our laws may be why evolutionists apply their notion of randomness to entities and systems in our universe, but never to the underlying rules.
Darwin Acknowledged Intelligent Laws
In the last chapter of his main work, The Origin of Species, Darwin observed the endless variety of complex life forms and remarked in a reverential way that “these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us…” In effect, Darwin was acknowledging unknown forces that predetermine the development of life forms and give them their advantages and complexity. We, of course, already know that intelligent intervention is the unknown force at work.
No comments:
Post a Comment